Welcoming Change Whilst in the Realm of Software Development

    The idea of welcoming change is one of the hardest Nearshore Developmentprinciples to put into practice.

    The Agile manifesto includes the following two assertions of values:

    1. Customer involvement in contract negotiations
    2. Adjusting to change instead of sticking to a plan

    Both of these claims imply that Agile Software Development accepts modifications from clients and other project stakeholders. By creating regular releases and developing the product through a series of iterations, the software development team hopes to collect input. Contrary to how many approaches address the subject of requirements changing, a customer changing their mind about a project’s needs isn’t seen as a problem. Because it results in the creation of software that consumers actually want, this integration of client feedback and involvement is crucial to the success of agile processes. The use of this principle must begin at the very beginning of a project, thus adhering to it is no simple undertaking. The role of the executive sponsor and other business-oriented positions within a company that need to buy-in and support an endeavor to adopt Agile Software Development are commonly mentioned in guides to implementing Agile Software Development. However, businesspeople in a software development company that creates custom software for clients directly must be aware of and committed to the Agile Software Development tenets.

    Although Nearshore Development may have the backing of all team members, business folks generally believe that it is something that engineers handle and does not immediately affect them. That is a very reasonable assumption to make given how much of the literature on Agile Software Development focuses particularly on Software Development teams. The client must be informed of the nature of an Agile Software Development project in a company that creates custom software, and a contract must be drafted that is compatible with the selected technique. Additionally, it is typically the businesspeople involved in a project who are in charge of negotiating the contract and determining the client’s expectations for the project.

    When negotiating a new project with a software development company, customers who are not particularly familiar with the field assume that the process will be fairly similar to buying practically any other goods and services. The consumer expresses their needs, the parties come to an agreement on a price and a delivery date, and the customer then waits for their needs to be met. For fear of upsetting a customer and possibly losing their business, the software development company won’t want to contradict these assumptions. This frequently results in a legal arrangement that reflects these assumptions. The customer still anticipates that the program will be ready and perform to their specifications by the release date; all they need to do is waiting.

    The customer will inevitably need to offer feedback on the program and will be eager to make some modifications. In the aforementioned case, the customer will be required to provide feedback close to the software’s release date when they really get to use it.

    At this stage, it’s unlikely that the software development company will find these alterations particularly amenable. In actuality, these requests for revisions cause conflict between the client and the software development business and may even end in confrontations between the two parties. The business will insist on more money to implement these adjustments because it will think that these criteria weren’t initially defined when the contract was signed. A new contract will need to be negotiated if the client concurs. On the other hand, if the customer is undoubtedly very dissatisfied that the program does not perform what the customer wants, the corporation might agree to make these improvements for free. The corporation is getting closer to incurring a loss on the project the more frequently these adjustments are handled without charge. The project will be late in either of these cases.

    Getting customer feedback earlier in the project can frequently help the case if the development team is attempting to be Agile and is building the project in iterations. However, if the contract stays the same, these alterations will still be disagreeable to the project’s commercial associates. The developers will be told to prolong the period for implementing these changes until a new or amended contract can be agreed because they will be considered as an additional expense.

    Previous Post Next Post